UNLV Affinity Group Portfolio
Governance Health by Domain
Strong governance, financial, and operational readiness across the affinity-group portfolio.
Member engagement strong in 4 of 6 affinity groups. Two require outreach strategy refresh.
IRB protocols current for all active studies. Data governance reviewed and compliant.
AI model registry complete. One model pending disparity audit before deployment.
Data-sharing agreements honor Tribal sovereignty. Two agreements pending council review.
Portfolio demonstrates measurable community impact. Outcome metrics need standardization.
What the Scores Reveal
Research Compliance Excellence
All active IRB protocols are current and data governance has been reviewed — a portfolio strength.
Engagement Gap
Two of six affinity groups show declining member engagement. Outreach strategy refresh recommended.
Pending Disparity Audit
One AI model in the registry has not completed disparity auditing — blocking responsible deployment.
Tribal Council Review
Two data-sharing agreements await Tribal council review. Timeline impacts planned research start dates.
Path to Readiness
Identified gaps between current state and readiness, with recommended remediation steps.
Governing Rules Behind the Scores
Each indicator connects to the actual statutes, regulations, and internal policies that govern it.
45 CFR 46 governs research compliance and human-subjects protection.
Governs Tribal data sovereignty and data-sharing agreement requirements.
Internal policy requires model registration and disparity audit before deployment.
Governs student-record privacy in academic affinity-group contexts.
Internal policy defines minimum engagement metrics and outreach cadence.
NSF requirements govern research data management and sharing.
Explore a Controlled Working Session
Mycelion offers controlled working sessions to explore how a governed, synthetic MycelScore demonstration could be scoped to an organization’s priorities.